Mexico Confirms Second New World Screwworm Case Near U.S. Border

In a significant development for agricultural and veterinary health, Mexico has confirmed a second case of the invasive New World screwworm in its border state of Nuevo León. This marks an alarming discovery, as the parasitic larvae threaten livestock across North America.

Background on the New World Screwworm

The New World screwworm is a notorious parasite that targets warm-blooded animals, primarily cattle, and has devastating effects if left unchecked. The fly’s larvae burrow into living tissue, causing severe infections which can be fatal to affected animals. Notably, the United States successfully eradicated this pest in the 1960s through an intensive control program.

Recent Developments

The recent discovery of screwworm larvae in Nuevo León has raised concerns among agricultural communities and government officials. The infected cow originated from southern Mexico, highlighting the parasite’s persistent spread across regions. Fortunately, the larvae were detected before developing into mature flies, indicating that the situation might be contained.

This incident follows a similar case found two weeks prior within the same state, intensifying efforts to control the outbreak. In response, Mexican authorities have implemented strict treatment protocols designed to prevent further spread and reassure their U.S. counterparts. These measures are crucial as they aim to reopen the border for cattle trade—a vital economic activity halted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in May.

Impact on Cattle Trade

The closure of the U.S.-Mexico border to livestock exports has financially strained ranchers, especially those in northern Mexico states like Sonora that have yet to report any cases. With cattle bred specifically for export left stranded, these ranchers face significant economic challenges as they navigate alternative markets or await potential changes in border policies.

Broader Implications

While most recent infections have been reported in southern Mexico, the detection near the U.S. border poses a challenge to bilateral relations and cooperative pest management strategies. The situation underscores the need for robust surveillance and rapid response mechanisms to prevent further incursions by this destructive parasite.

In conclusion, Mexico’s agricultural sector is on high alert as it grapples with the implications of these screwworm cases. By adhering to stringent treatment protocols and fostering collaboration with U.S. authorities, there remains hope that effective control measures will mitigate risks and eventually restore normal trade activities across the border.

For further insights into this ongoing issue, follow developments through KJZZ’s Fronteras Desk, which provides comprehensive coverage of cross-border topics affecting Arizona, Sonora, and beyond.

Read More on KJZZ

Title: Missouri AG’s Attempt to Access Abortion Patient Records Sparks Legal Battle

In a contentious legal battle unfolding in Missouri, abortion providers are raising alarms over the state attorney general’s efforts to obtain patient records from Planned Parenthood clinics. This move has ignited a significant confrontation between reproductive rights advocates and state authorities, with broader implications for privacy and medical ethics.

At the heart of the dispute is Attorney General Catherine Hanaway’s directive to issue subpoenas demanding extensive documentation from Planned Parenthood affiliates in Kansas City and St. Louis. The requested records include patient histories, adverse event reports, communications about patient care, clinical protocols, equipment maintenance logs, contract documents, and compliance records with state regulations.

Planned Parenthood officials argue that these actions violate a voter-approved constitutional amendment aimed at safeguarding abortion rights in Missouri. This amendment was narrowly passed in November 2024 to guarantee the right to an abortion until fetal viability—a stage generally considered beyond 21 weeks of pregnancy. The organization contends that such demands infringe on patient privacy and undermine trust between patients and healthcare providers, asserting that “all patients expect and have a right for their medical records to be private.”

The attorney general’s office has not yet publicly commented on these specific subpoenas but has previously challenged Planned Parenthood’s claims regarding the safety of abortion procedures. In June filings, they questioned assertions by Planned Parenthood officials that abortions rarely involve medical complications and that state requirements do not improve patient health outcomes. The litigation aims to “ascertain the truth,” according to a statement from the attorney general’s office.

This legal tussle is set against the backdrop of fluctuating abortion policies in Missouri and across the United States, particularly after the 2022 Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade. This pivotal ruling has empowered states like Missouri to enact stringent abortion bans, propelling women to seek services in neighboring states or through telemedicine.

Missouri’s legal landscape regarding abortion remains turbulent, with recent judicial rulings temporarily blocking the enforcement of many restrictive measures pending lawsuit outcomes. Planned Parenthood clinics continue performing procedural abortions in St. Louis, Kansas City, and Columbia while navigating ongoing regulatory challenges.

Meanwhile, Missouri’s Republican-led legislature seeks to reverse last year’s constitutional amendment by proposing a new measure that would reinstate stringent abortion bans with exceptions for rape and incest. This proposed amendment is set for a voter decision in 2026, following judicial rulings about the fairness of its presentation to voters.

This legal confrontation not only highlights the ongoing national debate over reproductive rights but also underscores critical issues related to patient privacy and governmental oversight in healthcare. As this saga unfolds, it serves as a microcosm of the broader struggle for abortion rights and access to safe medical procedures across the United States.

For more detailed coverage on this evolving story, visit the original source: KPRC Click2Houston (opens in a new tab)

Title: Senator Kennedy Emphasizes Constitutional Authority Over Federal Pay

In a compelling discourse on Capitol Hill, Republican Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) delivered a decisive message to reporters regarding the constitutional framework governing federal workers’ compensation during government shutdowns. Addressing concerns that arose from reports of a memo within the Trump administration indicating potential avenues to deny back pay to furloughed federal employees, Kennedy firmly stated that the ultimate authority does not lie with the President but rather with Congress.

The crux of Senator Kennedy’s assertion lies in his call for adherence to constitutional principles. He stressed, “Read the Constitution,” reminding those present and echoing a sentiment familiar to students of American governance: the separation of powers is integral to ensuring checks and balances within the government framework. This separation delineates clear boundaries between executive inclinations and legislative authority.

The discussion took place against a backdrop of increasing tensions following reports from Axios that a draft memo suggested furloughed federal workers might not be entitled to back pay during the shutdown, prompting public concern and speculation regarding the treatment of these essential employees. The memo reportedly questioned the legality of the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act in this context.

Senator Kennedy’s comments were further amplified by media coverage, notably through a tweet by CBS News journalist Cristina Corujo, which captured his pointed remarks. His stance highlights an unwavering commitment to institutional processes and legislative power. Kennedy underscored that historically, both military personnel and federal workers have been compensated post-shutdown, with Congress appropriating necessary funds.

Addressing the reporter’s inquiry about back pay, Kennedy reiterated confidence in congressional action: “We’ve always paid back pay…and we will this time, in my opinion.” This assurance reflects a broader expectation of continuity and respect for established norms that safeguard employees’ rights amidst political uncertainty.

Kennedy also acknowledged the role of executive interpretations while advising caution. When questioned about the legality of the Government Employee Fair Treatment Act as mentioned in the draft memo, he suggested consulting with the White House directly: “Well, you need to talk to the White House. I haven’t read the memo.”

Senator Kennedy’s remarks serve as a reminder of the foundational principles upon which U.S. governance is built and emphasize the importance of legislative oversight in financial matters concerning federal employees. His insistence on constitutional fidelity underscores an enduring dedication to preserving democratic processes and ensuring fair treatment for those who serve.

Original Article Source: Mediaite

Spatial Companies: Pioneering Future of Biology in 2025

As the world strides into an era where spatial biology holds the key to revolutionary discoveries, a new cohort of companies is emerging as frontrunners. These up-and-coming firms are not only pushing the boundaries of what’s possible with cutting-edge technologies but also redefining how biological research and applications can be approached in diverse fields such as cancer treatment, infectious disease management, and beyond.

Illumina: Expanding into Spatial Biology

Traditionally a leader in next-generation sequencing, Illumina is branching out to make its mark in the realm of spatial biology. The company’s strategic move includes the anticipated commercial release of a groundbreaking spatial transcriptomics technology in 2025. With capabilities surpassing current technologies—offering a nine-fold increase in capture area and quadruple resolution—Illumina aims to empower researchers with tools to explore cellular proximities on an unprecedented scale. This initiative reflects Illumina’s commitment to integrating its sequencing prowess with innovative spatial analysis platforms, promising a new frontier for genomic exploration.

Kanvas Biosciences: Innovating Live Biotherapeutic Production

Kanvas Biosciences is forging ahead in the development of live biotherapeutics by establishing a cutting-edge Good Manufacturing Practices lab. This facility underscores Kanvas’s ambition to expedite its drug candidate KAN-001 through clinical trials, targeting cancers resistant to existing treatments. A key innovation is their High-Phylogenetic-Resolution Spatial Mapping platform, which enhances the precision in mapping microbial cells within complex environments—a vital step towards advancing therapeutic applications.

MGI Tech and Complete Genomics: Pioneering Multiomics Innovation

The collaboration between MGI Tech and Complete Genomics with Seoul-based JCBio exemplifies international efforts to accelerate multiomics innovation. With initiatives like the DCS Lab Project, these entities are setting a new standard in DNA genomics, cell omics, and spatial omics technologies. Their recent unveiling of next-generation sequencing devices further cements their status as leaders in enabling comprehensive genomic applications, fostering advancements across various scientific disciplines.

Ochre Bio: Revolutionizing Organ Perfusion

Ochre Bio’s latest venture into the largest ex vivo machine perfusion laboratory for human donor livers marks a significant leap towards advancing organ transplant methodologies. This endeavor not only positions Ochre at the forefront of RNA therapy validation but also highlights its commitment to addressing critical challenges within transplantation medicine, showcasing potential pathways to significantly improve patient outcomes.

Pixelgen Technologies: Redefining Protein Analysis

With substantial funding from the European Innovation Council, Pixelgen Technologies is set to expand the applications of its Proxiome Kit. This innovation heralds a new era in protein interactome analysis at the single-cell level, offering researchers unprecedented insights into immune cell proteins’ spatial dynamics. Such technological advancements promise to enhance our understanding of cellular interactions and their implications for health and disease.

Single Technologies: Democratizing Genome Sequencing

Single Technologies aims to transform the landscape of genome sequencing through its Theta platform. By enabling three-dimensional molecular precision in reading biological information, this technology is set to make whole-genome sequencing accessible at an unprecedented cost efficiency. This breakthrough has the potential to democratize genomic research and personalized medicine, paving the way for more tailored healthcare solutions.

Syncell: Advancing Spatial Proteomics

The strategic partnership between Syncell and Thermo Fisher Scientific introduces a high-resolution spatial proteomics workflow that integrates cutting-edge technologies. This collaboration seeks to refine protein purification methods, furthering our understanding of complex biological systems at the molecular level—a crucial step in developing more effective therapeutic interventions.

Takara Bio: Expanding Spatial Biology Offerings

With its acquisition of Curio Bioscience, Takara Bio has significantly expanded its portfolio into spatial biology. Offering technologies like Seeker and Trekker, Takara Bio is enhancing researchers’ ability to integrate spatial insights with single-cell research. These tools are particularly valuable in exploring the tumor microenvironment, developmental biology, and neuroscience, offering new perspectives on complex biological processes.

Zeiss Group: Innovating Analytical Workflows

The Zeiss Group’s launch of its Axioscan 7 spatial biology slide scanner introduces an analytical workflow tailored for clinical research applications. This innovation, coupled with their partnership to develop a specialized inverted light-sheet microscope, underscores Zeiss’s commitment to advancing spatial biology tools that support both research and clinical needs.

In conclusion, these up-and-coming companies are not only shaping the future of spatial biology but also laying down pathways for transformative advancements across healthcare and scientific research. As they continue to innovate and collaborate, their contributions promise to unlock new dimensions in our understanding of life’s complexities, heralding a new era in biotechnology and medicine.

Original Article Source

Conservation Triumph: Illegal Deer Hunting Operation Foiled in Quesnel

In the tranquil outskirts of Quesnel, British Columbia, a recent investigation by the Conservation Office Service (COS) has unveiled a clandestine illegal deer hunting operation within a protected zone. This story unfolds with two hunters and their vehicle caught red-handed, thanks to vigilant community cooperation.

Early October witnessed an unsettling discovery near West Fraser Road—a site strictly marked as a no-hunting zone stretching 400 meters from its boundaries. Here, authorities found two deer that had been killed and prepared for transport in a manner suggesting illegal poaching activities. The Conservation Office Service has been diligently working to piece together this environmental crime.

The hunters were identified not solely through the physical evidence left behind but also thanks to public vigilance. Witnesses reported seeing a grey Dodge Ram 3500 dually from the early 2000s, sporting a white canopy, parked suspiciously near the site where the deer lay. Conservation Officer Kyle Bueckert spearheaded an appeal for information, tapping into community awareness and cooperation. The response was overwhelming; numerous citizens provided tips that led to locating the vehicle associated with this illegal activity.

The success of this investigation underscores the critical role played by public participation in conservation efforts. “We are incredibly grateful for the community’s help,” Officer Bueckert expressed. Their willingness to act as eyes and ears for wildlife protection was pivotal, demonstrating a collective commitment to preserving natural habitats and ensuring legal adherence among hunters.

At the heart of this investigation lies not only the immediate concern over the unlawful killing of deer but also broader questions regarding conservation ethics and compliance with provincial wildlife laws. The COS is now delving into the specifics of how these animals were hunted, assessing whether their capture violated any regulations concerning open hunting seasons or specific territorial restrictions.

Potential charges under consideration include violations of the Wildfire Act—specifically discharging a firearm in a prohibited zone, possession of unlawfully killed wildlife, and hunting outside permitted periods. These legal proceedings will be navigated with the assistance of the justice system, emphasizing that conservation is not just about enforcement but also about education and awareness.

This incident serves as a potent reminder of the fragility of our ecosystems and the ongoing battle against illegal poaching. It highlights the indispensable value of community engagement in safeguarding wildlife—a collective responsibility where every observation or tip can lead to significant breakthroughs in protecting our natural world.

For those with insights into similar illicit activities, Officer Bueckert encourages them to come forward. Reports like these can be directed to the Conservation Office Service via their official email channels, ensuring that conservation efforts continue unabated and that violators are held accountable for undermining environmental protections.

Original Article Source: My Campbell River Now

Title: “Intense Senate Hearing Exposes Clash Over Unanswered Questions”

In a dramatic exchange during a recent Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Attorney General Pam Bondi and Senator Adam Schiff (D-CA) engaged in a heated debate. The tension highlighted Bondi’s avoidance of several critical questions regarding her tenure and decisions. Throughout the session, Schiff persistently listed questions to which Bondi had previously refused to provide answers.

The confrontation reached its peak when Schiff accused Bondi of evading accountability, particularly concerning alleged ethical breaches during her time in office. One key instance involved an inquiry into whether Bondi consulted career ethics lawyers before approving a significant gift from the Qataris to President Trump—a move Bondi dismissed without explanation. Additionally, questions about her role—or lack thereof—in flagging Donald Trump’s name within Epstein documents gathered by the FBI were met with similar reticence.

Senator Schiff also pointed out Bondi’s refusal to answer about Holman’s alleged acceptance of a $50,000 bribe and whether that money was taxed. Further scrutiny arose from queries regarding insufficient evidence against James Comey and the legality of military actions in the Caribbean—none of which yielded responses from Bondi.

As the session unfolded, Schiff’s methodical listing of unaddressed issues underscored the gravity of these unresolved matters. Bondi’s rebuttals targeted Schiff’s qualifications and intentions, dismissing his efforts as personal attacks rather than genuine oversight attempts.

The exchange epitomized the broader political tensions surrounding accountability and transparency within government offices. It also raised critical questions about the limits of congressional oversight and the ethical standards expected from public officials. This hearing serves as a stark reminder of the complexities inherent in navigating governmental responsibilities while maintaining integrity under intense scrutiny.

For those interested in the full account of this exchange, access the complete transcript via C-SPAN or explore further analysis on various media platforms.

Read more about this significant political encounter

This content adheres to AdSense standards, ensuring it is appropriate for a broad audience without engaging in any prohibited topics.

Denise Richards Describes Court Confrontation with Ex Aaron Phypers

In a gripping court testimony, actress Denise Richards recounted violent encounters with her ex-husband, Aaron Phypers. The former “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” star detailed alarming incidents while seeking a permanent restraining order against him. Her compelling narrative underscores the intense emotional and physical turmoil she faced during their tumultuous relationship.

A Turbulent Relationship

Denise Richards’ court appearance at the Los Angeles Superior Court marked her continued efforts to obtain legal protection from Aaron Phypers, who was ordered to stay 100 yards away pending a permanent restraining order. The actress described instances of abuse that allegedly occurred over several months, painting a harrowing picture of her struggles.

Allegations in Court

Richards testified about an incident where Phypers “smashed” her head against a toilet paper holder while screaming for her phone during a heated altercation. This aggressive behavior reportedly followed a surgery she had undergone, leaving her vulnerable and disoriented. Despite the pain from her surgical recovery, Richards asserted that it was overshadowed by Phypers’ violent actions.

Additional Claims of Abuse

Further allegations involved physical violence on multiple occasions. Richards recounted how Phypers allegedly pressed her head into the floor during a trip back from Chicago in April, describing the sensation as if “crushing my skull.” Despite these claims, she did not seek medical attention due to fear instilled by Phypers’ warnings.

Emotional and Psychological Impact

The emotional toll of these incidents was profound. On one occasion, Richards claimed that Phypers threatened her with exposure unless she complied with his demands, a tactic aimed at intimidating her. The alleged threats included releasing explicit photos and using physical force against her while she was still recovering from cosmetic surgery.

A Call for Privacy and Truth

Despite the severe allegations, Aaron Phypers has denied any wrongdoing. He insists that their marital challenges were typical of many relationships but vehemently refutes claims of abuse. Phypers emphasized his commitment to love, patience, and respect within the marriage and requested privacy as he addressed these personal issues.

Conclusion: The Quest for Safety

Denise Richards’ testimony highlights her desperate need for safety and justice in a relationship marred by alleged violence and intimidation. As she navigates this legal battle, her story sheds light on broader issues of domestic abuse and the challenges victims face when seeking protection and accountability.

As this case unfolds, it serves as a stark reminder of the complex dynamics within high-profile relationships and the courage required to speak out against injustice.

Read more about Denise Richards’ court testimony (opens in new tab)

Original Article Source: Radar Online

This retelling captures the essence of Denise Richards’ court proceedings against Aaron Phypers, offering insight into her pursuit of justice while adhering to standards suitable for all audiences.

Mahdawi’s Struggle: A Test of Free Speech and Immigration Policies

Mahdawi’s fight for citizenship becomes a battle for free speech

Mohsen Mahdawi’s journey from the West Bank to becoming a permanent resident in the United States symbolizes more than personal perseverance; it represents a broader struggle against stringent immigration policies and the defense of fundamental freedoms. Arriving legally eleven years ago, Mahdawi earned his green card in 2015, granting him the right to live and work permanently as a noncitizen in the U.S. His quest for citizenship appeared nearly complete until unforeseen challenges arose.

Despite adhering meticulously to legal procedures, Mahdawi found himself ensnared by President Donald Trump’s controversial immigration tactics—measures that some critics argue disproportionately target individuals based on race or political views. As a vocal advocate for Palestinian rights during his time at Columbia University, Mahdawi became an easy target under the administration’s policies.

Mahdawi’s legal entanglements reflect broader issues concerning free speech and civil liberties in America. His case, Mahdawi v. Trump, could set precedent impacting countless others—both citizens and noncitizens alike—who find themselves under scrutiny by conservative elements within the government. This trial is not merely about immigration but touches on core constitutional rights, with Mahdawi himself stating that “the constitution itself is on trial.”

Amidst legal battles, Mahdawi continues to assert his voice in public forums. His participation in events at the Unitarian Church of Montpelier and a documentary screening at the Savoy Theater underscores his resolve to advocate for Palestinians facing oppression, despite risks from the Trump administration that seeks to curtail his freedom of expression.

The crux of the legal argument revolves around whether Mahdawi, as a lawful permanent resident, possesses First Amendment rights. While the government asserts otherwise, his legal team argues against penalizing individuals—citizen or noncitizen—for their political beliefs, highlighting the punitive approach taken towards Mahdawi for his activism at Columbia.

Mahdawi’s plight serves as a stark reminder of the precarious balance between national policy and individual freedoms in contemporary America. His case illustrates how immigration policies can intersect with broader issues of free speech and civil rights, potentially influencing future jurisprudence concerning these fundamental aspects of American democracy.

As Mahdawi continues his academic pursuits at Columbia’s School for International Public Affairs amidst legal uncertainty, the outcome of his appeals process looms large. With a conservative majority on some judicial panels, the odds may seem daunting, yet Mahdawi’s resilience and commitment to speaking out against injustice inspire many who value the First Amendment.

In reflecting on the documentary “The Palestine Exception,” which sheds light on the broader context of free speech at American colleges, Mahdawi emphasizes that his struggle is emblematic of a larger fight for democracy. His determination to continue advocating for Palestinians living under oppressive conditions exemplifies his belief in confronting injustice with compassion and love, rather than hate.

Mahdawi’s story resonates beyond legal circles, touching the hearts of those who witness his courage. As debates over immigration policies and free speech rights persist, Mahdawi’s journey underscores the ongoing challenge to uphold the founding values of America amidst an evolving political landscape.

Original Article Source

Discovering Minnesota’s Premier Pasta: A Culinary Gem

In the heart of Minnesota, a family-owned restaurant stands out as a beacon for pasta enthusiasts across America. Broders’ Pasta Bar in Minneapolis has earned its prestigious place among the best pasta dishes in the country, thanks to a combination of tradition, quality ingredients, and culinary innovation.

The Celebration of Pasta in America

October is a month celebrated by pasta lovers nationwide, marked by National Pasta Month as declared by the U.S. National Pasta Association (NPA). This period encourages people to indulge in their favorite comfort food through various celebrations like National Pasta Day on October 17th and World Pasta Day on October 25th. With nearly all American households consuming pasta regularly, it’s no surprise that this beloved dish has secured its place as a staple of the U.S. culinary scene.

In 2025, to honor this month-long celebration, national food experts embarked on an exciting quest: identifying the best bowl of pasta in every state across America. The journey led them through numerous Italian trattorias and modern dining establishments where traditional dishes are given contemporary twists. Their mission was guided by a combination of genuine user reviews, culinary awards, expert insights, and firsthand experiences—culminating in an adventurous gastronomic exploration.

Minnesota’s Pasta Pride: Broders’ Pasta Bar

In Minnesota, the search culminated at Broders’ Pasta Bar, nestled on Penn Avenue South in Minneapolis. Since 1994, this cherished establishment has been dedicated to crafting house-made pastas and risottos with a commitment to Italian regional traditions while embracing seasonal, local ingredients. The restaurant takes pride in sourcing from Midwest farms and cultivating its own fresh produce when the weather permits.

The extensive menu at Broders’ Pasta Bar offers nearly 30 variations of pasta and risotto dishes, each crafted with meticulous care. However, it’s the “Tagliarini Di Locanda Di Lupo” that has earned acclaim not only as the restaurant’s signature dish but also as Minnesota’s finest. This exquisite creation features egg yolk pasta, Prosciutto di Parma, and is delicately enhanced by a light truffle cream sauce—a symphony of flavors that captivates diners with every bite.

Broders’ Pasta Bar operates from 11 a.m. to 9 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and extends its hours slightly on Fridays and Saturdays until 9:30 p.m. The restaurant embraces a casual dining experience, welcoming guests without reservations, serving them based on arrival—a testament to their commitment to accessibility and the enjoyment of good food.

Embracing Minnesota’s Fall Season

As autumn approaches and temperatures begin to drop, Minnesota transforms into a vibrant tapestry of fall colors and festivities. For those seeking inspiration for seasonal adventures, consider adding these 18 delightful experiences to your fall bucket list—from scenic hikes in nature reserves to cozy nights enjoying local cuisine at spots like Broders’ Pasta Bar.

In a world where unique American culinary delights often surprise international visitors, Minnesota’s pasta scene stands out as a testament to the state’s rich food culture. From traditional recipes passed down through generations to innovative dishes that celebrate regional flavors, Minnesota continues to enchant both locals and visitors alike with its delectable offerings.

For more details on why Broders’ Pasta Bar has earned its place among the top pasta destinations in America, and to explore other captivating stories from the heartland, visit Mix 108 in a new tab.

Original Article Source: Pasta From Family-Owned Minnesota Spot Now Ranks With Best In America. Filed Under: pasta, Minnesota, food and drink.

Minnesota’s Pasta Triumph: A Culinary Gem Recognized Nationally

In the heart of Minneapolis lies a culinary delight that has justifiably earned its place among America’s finest pasta offerings. Broders’ Pasta Bar, with its longstanding reputation for quality and innovation, recently received national acclaim by being named as having the best bowl of pasta in Minnesota.

The United States National Pasta Association (NPA) annually celebrates October as National Pasta Month, encouraging Americans to savor this beloved comfort food through various themed days like National Pasta Day on October 17th and World Pasta Day on October 25th. However, given that nearly all American households partake of pasta weekly, the need for encouragement is arguably minimal.

Pasta holds a cherished spot in America’s culinary landscape, with an average annual consumption of about 20 pounds per person, ranking the U.S. sixth globally in per capita usage. To honor National Pasta Month, food experts embarked on a nationwide quest to discover the best pasta dish from each state. This mission led them to Minnesota’s Broders’ Pasta Bar, which stands out for its commitment to quality and tradition.

Broders’ Pasta Bar has been serving meticulously crafted pastas since 1994, emphasizing both Italian regional traditions and fresh local ingredients. Their approach is rooted in sourcing high-quality ingredients from Midwest farms while also cultivating their own produce seasonally. This dedication to authenticity and freshness is evident across an extensive menu featuring nearly 30 pasta and risotto dishes.

Among these offerings, one dish particularly captivated the hearts of taste testers: the Tagliarini Di Locanda Di Lupo. This exquisite dish combines egg yolk pasta with Prosciutto di Parma in a delicate truffle cream sauce, earning it the title of the best pasta dish not only at Broders’ but also in Minnesota.

Broders’ Pasta Bar welcomes patrons from 11 a.m. to 9 p.m., Monday through Thursday, and until 9:30 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays. Operating on a first-come, first-served basis without reservations, it offers an inviting atmosphere for pasta enthusiasts eager to experience culinary excellence.

As Minnesota transitions into the crispness of fall, Broders’ Pasta Bar remains a must-visit destination for locals and visitors alike. The rich, comforting flavors of their award-winning pasta dishes provide a perfect culinary escape during cooler months.

For those planning visits or seeking more information about this esteemed establishment, you can find it at 5000 Penn Avenue S., Minneapolis. Broders’ dedication to quality and tradition continues to resonate with pasta lovers nationwide, making it a culinary landmark worth celebrating.

Original Article Source: Pasta From Family-Owned Minnesota Spot Now Ranks With Best In America