Uncovering New Evidence in the Robert Roberson Case

In a dramatic turn of events, new evidence has emerged that could potentially alter the course of justice for Robert Roberson. This revelation comes just as his execution date looms near, shedding light on possible judicial bias and misconduct that may have tainted his trial decades ago.

The Case Against Robert Roberson

Robert Roberson was convicted in 2003 for the murder of his two-year-old daughter, Nikki, based on shaken baby syndrome—a contentious medical theory. After bringing Nikki to an emergency room in Palestine, Texas, she was later declared brain dead and removed from life support in Dallas, leading to charges against Roberson.

Allegations of Judicial Bias

Roberson’s attorney, Gretchen Sween, has uncovered evidence suggesting that Judge Bascom Bentley, who oversaw the trial, may have had a conflict of interest. It appears Bentley authorized Nikki’s removal from life support without Roberson’s consent—a critical decision that violated Texas law. This unauthorized action was allegedly concealed during the trial, raising questions about fairness and due process.

New Evidence Emerges

The controversy intensified when evidence came to light through an NBC Dateline podcast. Larry Bowman, Nikki’s paternal grandfather, disclosed on the podcast that Bentley was the Anderson County official who permitted the life support withdrawal—a fact not revealed during Roberson’s trial. This new revelation suggests a grave breach of ethical standards and legal protocol.

The Fight for Justice

In response to these findings, Sween filed a Notice of New Evidence with the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (TCCA). She argues that Bentley’s undisclosed actions necessitate a retrial for Roberson. Recognizing the urgency, the TCCA granted a stay of execution, sending the case back for further review.

A Community Divided

The case has sparked bipartisan interest in Austin and beyond. In 2024, both Republican and Democratic members of the Texas House intervened, leading to a temporary reprieve from Roberson’s scheduled execution. This unprecedented move underscored the gravity of potential judicial misconduct involved.

The Path Forward

As Sween continues her tireless efforts to save Roberson, the community watches with bated breath. Will this new evidence prove to be another miracle for Roberson? Time will tell if justice will prevail, and whether a retrial will offer Roberson the chance to clear his name.

This case not only highlights systemic issues within the judicial process but also underscores the importance of transparency and integrity in upholding the law. As Austin’s independent news source, The Austin Chronicle remains committed to uncovering the truth and advocating for justice.


The Austin Chronicle is an independent, locally owned alternative newsweekly that reflects the heart and soul of Austin, Texas.

Read More

Support The Austin Chronicle in its mission to provide free, fair, and fearless reporting. Your contributions help keep this vital service alive for the community.