Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize Chances: “Such Conduct Cannot Be Deemed as Promoting Peace”

In a world increasingly defined by political tensions and global conflicts, the question of who should be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize remains both pertinent and contentious. Recently, Nina Graeger, director of Oslo’s Institute for Research in International Peace (PRIO), weighed in on this debate with a resolute stance that Donald Trump does not qualify as a contender for this prestigious award in 2025.

As the world grapples with more conflicts than at any point since the symbolic end of the Cold War in 1989, Graeger highlights the critical role of humanitarian organizations. In her analysis, these entities are paramount to fostering peace amid global turmoil. According to PRIO’s data, as of late September 2025, there were 61 active armed conflicts involving 36 nations—a stark reminder of humanity’s enduring struggles.

Graeger expressed a personal inclination towards honoring humanitarian groups that mobilize volunteers to aid war victims. A notable example is the Crisis Response Shelters in Sudan, which provide essential services ranging from food kitchens and water supplies to complex medical assistance for those affected by civil war. These efforts epitomize the selfless dedication necessary to promote peace in conflict zones.

Beyond these organizations, Graeger points to bodies such as the International Criminal Court and the World Trade Organization as deserving of recognition for their roles in upholding justice and economic stability. The International Women’s League for Peace also garners her admiration for its unwavering commitment to fostering global harmony.

Graeger remains skeptical about the Nobel Committee selecting an individual laureate this year, particularly given the controversial actions attributed to Trump’s administration. Critics argue that withdrawing from the World Health Organization and reneging on the Paris Climate Agreement—alongside initiating trade wars with allies—are actions incongruent with Alfred Nobel’s vision of promoting peace.

Furthermore, Trump’s confrontational stance toward Denmark over Greenland and his domestic use of military force have compounded concerns regarding his commitment to peaceful governance. These measures stand in stark contrast to the ideals that the Nobel Peace Prize seeks to uphold.

In conclusion, while Donald Trump has publicly expressed hopes for receiving the Nobel Peace Prize, Graeger’s insights underscore a broader consensus: promoting peace requires actions aligned with compassion and cooperation, not division and aggression. As we move forward, it is imperative that global leaders prioritize diplomacy and humanitarianism in their pursuit of lasting peace.

Original Article Source: Nowy Dziennik