Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize Hopes Debunked: “This Stance Cannot Be Recognized as Promoting Peace”

In a recent evaluation by the renowned Norwegian Institute for International Peace Research (PRIO) in Oslo, Nina Graeger articulated her opinion on this year’s potential laureates for the Nobel Peace Prize. She firmly stated that former U.S. President Donald Trump does not have any chance of receiving the prestigious award. As someone who has been deeply involved in international peace research, Graeger pointed out that humanitarian organizations are far more deserving candidates given their pivotal role in alleviating suffering amidst global conflicts.

In her discussion with PAP, Graeger revealed insights from ongoing analyses indicating a surge in armed conflicts as of September 2025. The statistics showed involvement of 36 countries in 61 active military confrontations—the highest number since the symbolic end of the Cold War in 1989. In each scenario, civilians are bearing the brunt of these wars and urgently need aid.

Graeger expressed a particular hope that humanitarian groups, often powered by volunteers striving to assist war victims, would be recognized for their efforts. She highlighted Crisis Response Shelters operating in Sudan as exemplary entities that provide essential services—from field kitchens and water supplies to complex medical assistance—to those affected by civil wars.

Moreover, she acknowledged organizations like the International Criminal Court (ICC), the World Trade Organization (WTO), and the International Women’s League for Peace and Freedom as deserving of this year’s recognition. These bodies are instrumental in upholding free speech and justice globally.

Despite Trump’s consistent claims of contributing to global peace—primarily through his administration’s actions such as withdrawing from the World Health Organization and the Paris Climate Agreement, initiating trade wars with numerous countries, including close allies, and militarizing domestic protests—he faces skepticism regarding these assertions. Graeger criticized these actions for contradicting Alfred Nobel’s vision, which is rooted in promoting global peace.

Further undermining Trump’s prospects are recent tensions involving Gaza, which Graeger does not see as sufficient justification for awarding him the Peace Prize. She underscored that such a stance fundamentally opposes efforts to promote peace.

As the Nobel Committee deliberates on this year’s recipients, Graeger anticipates a collective recognition over individual accolades, favoring those truly advancing humanitarian and peaceful objectives worldwide.

Original article source: Nowy Dziennik