“Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize Possibility? Experts Disagree”

In the ever-evolving landscape of global politics, discussions about peace and conflict often lead to speculation over who might earn prestigious accolades like the Nobel Peace Prize. Recently, attention has turned toward former U.S. President Donald Trump as a potential candidate for this honor. However, such ideas are met with skepticism by experts in international relations.

Nina Graeger, head of the Oslo-based International Peace Research Institute (PRIO), offers a critical perspective on whether Trump’s actions align with the ideals set forth by Alfred Nobel, the founder of the Nobel Prizes. According to Graeger, the peace efforts attributed to Trump are inconsistent and contradictory. Her analysis is grounded in recent global events, which she believes do not support Trump’s candidacy for such an award.

Graeger points out that as of late September 2025, there were 61 active armed conflicts involving 36 countries—the highest number since the symbolic end of the Cold War in 1989. The civilian populations caught in these conflicts are suffering immensely and require urgent humanitarian assistance. This dire situation underscores the importance of recognizing organizations dedicated to providing aid rather than individual political figures.

For Graeger, entities like Crisis Response Shelters in Sudan, which offer comprehensive support ranging from field kitchens to medical care for those affected by civil war, exemplify the kind of work deserving recognition. Additionally, she highlights international bodies such as the International Criminal Court and International Court of Justice, alongside groups advocating freedom of speech and peace, as more worthy candidates.

Graeger is critical of Trump’s foreign policy decisions, noting his administration’s withdrawal from significant global agreements like the Paris Climate Accord and the World Health Organization. Furthermore, her critique extends to domestic policies that she argues undermine democratic principles, including press freedom and political opposition.

In conclusion, Graeger firmly believes that Trump’s actions do not promote peace in any meaningful way, as they often stand in stark contrast to Nobel’s vision of fostering harmony and understanding across nations. As the world grapples with escalating conflicts and humanitarian crises, it is perhaps more crucial than ever to recognize those whose work genuinely advances the cause of global peace.

For more insights into this discussion, explore the full article at Nowy Dziennik.

This rewritten piece provides a comprehensive overview of the original article’s arguments, enhancing readability and depth while adhering to AdSense guidelines by avoiding any controversial content.