Indirect Talks Between Israel and Hamas Begin in Egypt Over Trump’s Gaza Plan

In a pivotal moment on October 6, 2025, representatives from Israel and the Palestinian resistance movement Hamas convened for indirect negotiations in Egypt. This diplomatic engagement centers around US President Donald Trump’s 20-point plan aimed at revitalizing the Gaza Strip. Held under the auspices of Egyptian diplomacy, the talks took place in the scenic resort city of Sharm el-Sheikh, signifying a critical juncture in Middle Eastern politics.

The initiative involves a carefully orchestrated sequence where Arab mediators initially engaged with the Hamas delegation. Subsequently, these intermediaries were scheduled to meet with Israeli representatives. The Egyptian and Qatari mediators’ role is crucial as they assess outcomes from both sides before integrating US Special Envoy Steve Winkoff into the dialogue.

A focal point of discussion is Trump’s comprehensive plan for Gaza—a strategy that has seen partial acceptance by Hamas, who have consented to release Israeli captives provided specific conditions are met. Additionally, Hamas expressed willingness to transition Gaza’s governance to a technocratic body reflecting Palestinian national consensus and regional support.

President Trump, known for his proactive engagement on social media platform Truth Social, underscored the urgency of these talks. He advocated for an immediate halt to hostilities in Gaza, emphasizing that “Hamas is ready for a lasting peace.” His messages conveyed both optimism about rapid progress and caution against potential “MASSIVE BLOODSHED” should negotiations falter.

Despite these diplomatic efforts, significant challenges remain. Israel’s military operations since October 7, 2023, have resulted in substantial casualties among the Palestinian populace without meeting their stated objectives of dismantling Hamas or liberating captives. Concurrently, Gaza faces a humanitarian crisis exacerbated by restricted aid access and ongoing conflict.

Hamas steadfastly denies any commitment to disarm, emphasizing that such decisions must align with broader national positions and international law. This stance highlights the complexities surrounding Israel’s demand for complete withdrawal from Gaza and the contentious issue of Hamas’ armament.

As these discussions unfold, they represent a delicate dance of diplomacy amidst a backdrop of conflict and humanitarian distress. The outcomes could potentially reshape the future of Gaza, affecting both regional stability and the broader Middle Eastern geopolitical landscape.

For further insights into this developing story, follow updates at Press TV.